Major Marginalized Groups: A Closer Look

Marginalization is not a single experience. It works through many doors at once – gender, ability, ethnicity, age – and often through several at the same time. Some groups remain pushed to the edges of economic, political, and social life despite decades of policy promises. Understanding who these groups are, and why exclusion sticks to them, is the first step toward asking better questions about development itself. This post takes a closer look at four major marginalized groups: women, persons with disabilities, ethnic minorities, and the elderly.

Women and gender disparities
Exclusion from paid work
Limited political voice
Layered disadvantage for lower-class women
Disabled people and ethnic minorities
Persons with disabilities and the weight of stigma
Ethnic minorities and cultural discrimination
The elderly
A demographic shift underway
Changing families and social neglect
Economic insecurity and the gender angle
How marginalization overlaps

Women and gender disparities

Women form roughly half the population, yet they remain one of the most consistently excluded groups across work, politics, and economic decision-making. Gender disparity is not just about individual prejudice. It is built into laws, social norms, and everyday institutions that quietly favour men in access to education, health, mobility, and resources. The result is a gap that begins at birth and widens at every stage of life.

Exclusion from paid work

The clearest sign of this exclusion is how few women are in the paid workforce. Female labour force participation sits at around 23%, against roughly 76% for men, and women earn nearly a fifth less on average for similar work. Even among working women, the majority are concentrated in the informal sector – domestic work, agriculture, home-based piecework – doing low-paid jobs with little security or chance of advancement. A large share of unpaid household and care work also falls on women, and this labour rarely gets recognised as “real” economic activity.

The wage gap is not random. It comes from occupational segregation, where women are pushed into lower-paying sectors, and from discrimination in hiring and promotion. Social norms that restrict women’s movement and decision-making power make these economic barriers harder to break.

Limited political voice

Political life shows the same pattern. Women hold only about 10% of seats in the Lok Sabha, which sharply limits their influence over the policies that shape their lives. The Women’s Reservation Act of 2023 was designed to change this by reserving seats in legislatures, but its real test lies in implementation. Even at the local level, where reservations already exist, many elected women act as proxies for male relatives – a practice sometimes called the “Panchayat-Pati” system, where the husband runs affairs while the wife holds the title.

Layered disadvantage for lower-class women

Gender never acts alone. Women from Dalit, Adivasi, and other lower-caste or low-income backgrounds face caste, class, and gender discrimination stacked on top of each other. The United Nations notes that women from these communities, along with women with disabilities, experience multiple, overlapping forms of discrimination that deepen their vulnerability. A poor rural woman may be denied schooling, married early, paid less than men for the same farm work, and shut out of any decision that affects her household. Reservation policies that benefit better-off women can sometimes leave these groups still standing outside, which is why demands for sub-reservation within the women’s quota keep coming up.

Disabled people and ethnic minorities

Two very different groups – persons with disabilities and ethnic minorities – share a common thread: both are held back less by their own characteristics than by long-standing social biases. Stigma and cultural discrimination, built up over generations, keep opportunities out of reach.

Persons with disabilities and the weight of stigma

There are an estimated 70 million persons with disabilities, yet their presence in formal employment is startlingly low. One study cited that only about 0.1% are employed in industries, with the International Labour Organization reporting that nearly three-quarters of disabled persons remain outside the labour force entirely. The barriers are not mainly about ability. They are about attitude.

Much of the exclusion comes from societal stigma. Deep-rooted misconceptions about disability shape hiring decisions and workplace culture. A common belief that disability results from past sins or “bad karma” still feeds discrimination in many communities. Employers often assume co-workers will react badly, and many disabled people themselves avoid applying for jobs out of fear of social stigma and negative reactions. This reinforces low self-esteem and a sense of inferiority, creating a cycle that is hard to break.

Physical barriers add another layer. Inaccessible buildings, transport, and information systems make even getting to a workplace difficult. The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 bans discrimination, mandates equal opportunity, and requires reasonable accommodations and reservations. But enforcement is weak, especially in the private sector, where hiring a disabled person is still often treated as charity rather than a right. Cultural taboos, myths, and inadequate education continue to fuel the misconceptions the law was meant to dismantle.

Ethnic minorities and cultural discrimination

Ethnic minorities – chiefly the Adivasis, or “first inhabitants” – face a different but equally entrenched form of exclusion. Tribal communities number roughly 84 million people and over 700 ethnic groups, each with its own language, religion, and traditions. Their marginalization is historical, tied to land, identity, and a long pattern of being pushed aside by mainstream society.

One of the cruellest ironies appears in the name of development itself. Adivasi communities have repeatedly been displaced and rehabilitated for dams and projects they never wanted, exploited socially, economically, and politically. Mineral-rich tribal regions have funded state revenues while the communities living there stayed underdeveloped. Schools are often absent or fail to teach in local languages, so literacy rates lag well behind national averages. Despite constitutional safeguards like the Fifth and Sixth Schedules and reserved seats, tribal voices are routinely sidelined in decisions about forest rights and development, creating a cycle where their concerns never shape policy.

Cultural discrimination also operates through appearance and stereotype. People from the Northeast frequently face racism rooted in a colonial-era habit of treating them as racially different, flattening an enormously diverse region into a single “foreign-seeming” type. Smaller communities risk losing their distinct culture altogether as they are pressured to assimilate into dominant ways of life.

The elderly

The elderly are often left out of conversations about marginalization, perhaps because old age comes for everyone. But the neglect they face is real, and it is growing as the country’s age structure changes.

A demographic shift underway

The numbers are striking. The proportion of people aged 60 and above is projected to rise from 7.5% in 2010 to over 11% by 2025, with the absolute number of elderly expected to reach nearly 159 million by 2025. By 2050, older people are projected to outnumber children under 14. This is one of the fastest demographic transitions anywhere, and the support systems needed to handle it are not keeping pace.

Traditionally, care for older people rested almost entirely on the immediate family, especially within the joint family system. That structure is steadily weakening. Urbanisation, migration, and the shift toward nuclear households mean many older adults now navigate later life with more independence but also greater isolation. As one analysis put it, heavy reliance on family can itself lead to social isolation, neglect, and abuse when families are stretched for time or money.

Loss of authority within the home compounds the problem. As people age, they often move from a dominant to a subordinate position in the household, and the loss of “household headship” is closely linked to disregard for the aged. Studies in old-age homes record deep grief among residents who feel abandoned by the children they raised. Depression, anxiety, and feelings of neglect are common, made worse by fewer family visits and shrinking social contact.

Economic insecurity and the gender angle

Financial vulnerability deepens the neglect. A large share of older adults across Asia lack access to pensions, forcing many to keep working in the informal sector well past retirement age, without basic labour protections. Two-thirds of the elderly live in rural areas, and about half have poor socioeconomic status. Older women are especially exposed: they are nearly twice as likely as older men to have no income and have less access to care, even though they report poorer health. Because women tend to outlive men, this “feminization of ageing” leaves a large group of older women facing the end of life with the fewest resources.

Recognising the scale of the challenge, the government runs an umbrella scheme, the Atal Vayo Abhyudaya Yojana (AVYAY), signalling that the well-being of senior citizens is becoming a stated national priority. Whether such schemes can substitute for the eroding family safety net is still an open question.

How marginalization overlaps

These four groups are not sealed categories. They intersect and compound. An elderly tribal woman with a disability faces marginalization on several fronts at once – as a woman, as an Adivasi, as a disabled person, and as an older adult. Each layer multiplies the others. This is why single-issue policies often fall short: they address one door while leaving the rest firmly shut. Genuinely inclusive development has to recognise that the same person can be excluded in many ways simultaneously, and that lifting one barrier does little if the others remain.

What do you think? If marginalization so often works through overlapping identities, should development policy keep targeting one group at a time, or be redesigned around the people who sit at the intersections? And in a society where family has traditionally been the safety net, who should carry the responsibility of care when that net frays?

References

PDF 📄

Major Marginalized Groups: A Closer Look

Table of Contents

Women and gender disparities 🔗

Exclusion from paid work 🔗

Limited political voice 🔗

Layered disadvantage for lower-class women 🔗

Disabled people and ethnic minorities 🔗

Persons with disabilities and the weight of stigma 🔗

Ethnic minorities and cultural discrimination 🔗

The elderly 🔗

A demographic shift underway 🔗

Changing families and social neglect 🔗

Economic insecurity and the gender angle 🔗

How marginalization overlaps 🔗